Skip to Content
Logo
Menu
  • About Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Our People
  • Learning Library
  • Corporate Transparency Act
  • Contact
  • Make A Payment

Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants Narrows Further in Illinois

Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants Narrows Further in Illinois

June 10, 2021
Since 2017, Illinois has prohibited employers from imposing non-compete restrictions on “low-wage” employees who earn less than $13.00 per hour. Governor Pritzker is now expected to sign a bill (SB 672), which will further limit the ability of employers to enforce restrictive covenants.

SB 672 will amend the Freedom to Work Act to unambiguously apply to both covenants not to compete and covenants not to solicit.  Additionally, under SB 672, even otherwise valid restrictive covenants will not be enforced against employees who earn less than $75,000 per year and covenants not to solicit will not be enforced against employees who earn less than $45,000 per year.

For covenants not to compete, this salary threshold will increase every five years by $5,000 until January 1, 2037. Similarly, for covenants not to solicit, the salary threshold amounts will increase every five years by $2,500 until January 1, 2037.

The bill will also require employers to advise employees, in writing, to consult with an attorney before signing a non-compete or non-solicit agreement.  Employees will also be entitled to a minimum of 14 days to review such agreements before signing.

SB 672 also settles an eight year legal debate in Illinois by codifying the bright-line rule stated in Eric Fifield and Enterprise Financial Group, Inc. v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc. Per SB 672, “adequate consideration” sufficient to support a non-compete or non-solicit restriction requires: (1) the employee worked for the employer for at least 2 years after the employee signed an agreement containing a covenant not to compete or a covenant not to solicit; or (2) the employer otherwise provided consideration adequate to support an agreement to not compete or to not solicit, which can consist of a period of employment plus additional professional or financial benefits or merely professional or financial benefits adequate by themselves.

SB 672 will also nullify, with a few narrow exceptions, restrictive covenants executed by employees furloughed or terminated due to business circumstances or governmental orders related to COVID-19.  It will also nullify non-compete agreements executed by employees covered by certain collective bargaining agreements.

Employees who prevail on claims filed by employers to enforce restrictive covenants will be entitled to recover their costs and reasonable attorney’s fees from their employers.  SB 672 will take effect January 1, 2022, and will apply to any agreements entered on or after that date.

Employer Takeaways

SB 672 should not alarm CCM clients because we have been counseling caution with respect to restrictive covenants for years.  CCM has one of Illinois’ foremost experts on restrictive covenants, Kenneth J. Vanko, so give CCM a call before your business implements a restrictive covenant that may or may not be enforceable.

Related Attorneys

Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC
Lisle Office
2300 Cabot Drive, Suite 500
Lisle, Illinois, 60532
Phone 630.871.2600
Geneva Office
21 North 4th Street
Geneva, Illinois, 60134
Phone 630.938.4769
Fax 630.871.9869
General Inquires [email protected]
  • facebook
  • linkedin

Contact Us

©2025 Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC. All rights reserved.

Law Firm Web Design by NMC

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}