Skip to Content
Logo
Menu
  • About Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Our People
  • Learning Library
  • Corporate Transparency Act
  • Contact
  • Make A Payment

Employer Liability for Off-Premises Violence

Employer Liability for Off-Premises Violence

December 5, 2017

Employers must not tolerate sexual harassment or workplace violence on their premises. Not only is it wrong, but it exposes an employer to legal liability. But what about a situation when violence between two employees happens off premises? Is an employer liable under those circumstances? The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that an employee’s estate had the right to proceed with a lawsuit against an employer where one of the employer’s supervisors murdered a subordinate employee offpremises. The case of Anicich v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 16-1693 (7th Cir. March 24, 2017) is groundbreaking because until recently, Illinois employers were generally immune from intentional torts committed offpremises.

The Tragic Facts in Anicich.

In Anicich, a Home Depot supervisor named Brian Cooper verbally abused and sexually harassed a young female employee named Alisha Broomfield. Alisha worked with Cooper in Home Depot’s garden department from 2006 until 2012. In 2012, when Alisha was pregnant, Cooper asked Alisha to go to his sister’s wedding in Wisconsin. She refused. Cooper told Alisha he would fire her or reduce her hours if she did not relent. Alisha went to the wedding and when she refused to be in a relationship with Cooper, he strangled her to death. Cooper was found guilty of first degree intentional homicide and sentenced to two consecutive life terms.

The “Old” Rule for Employers.

Employers have a duty to act reasonably in hiring, supervising, and retaining their employees. Employees who are hurt by another employee can prove that an employer breached its duty if the injured employee can prove: 1) that the defendant-employer knew or should have known that an employee was unfit and created a danger to others; 2) the unfit employee caused the injured employee’s damages. Until recently, however, an injured employee also had to prove that his injury either occurred on the employer’s premises or using the employer’s chattel.

The Significance of Cooper’s Supervisory Status.

Home Depot argued that because Cooper’s homicide was committed offpremises, and without Home Depot chattels, Alisha’s case should be dismissed. The trial court accepted Home Depot’s argument but the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the argument. It held that Cooper used his supervisory authority to kill Alisha. The court reasoned that but for Cooper’s threats to either fire Alisha, or reduce her hours, Alisha would have never gone to the wedding. The Seventh Circuit reinstated the case which is now moving forward.

The Many Mistakes of Home Depot.

Home Depot was not a sympathetic defendant in this case. Home Depot knew that Cooper had harassed Alisha’s predecessor, Jessica, yet, it did nothing about that harassment and Jessica quit. Once, when Home Depot did discipline Cooper for harassing Alisha, it ordered him to take anger management classes. Home Depot never followed up, however, and Cooper never took the class.

The Takeaway.

Violent, angry, aggressive supervisors should be fired as soon as employers learn of their behavior, absent strong mitigating circumstances. Indeed, off-duty violence by supervisors that an employer learns about should be grounds for discipline, particularly if it is directed toward subordinate employees.

If you have any questions about the matters addressed in this CCM Alert, please contact the following CCM author or your regular CCM contact.

Related Attorneys

Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC
Lisle Office
2300 Cabot Drive, Suite 500
Lisle, Illinois, 60532
Phone 630.871.2600
Geneva Office
21 North 4th Street
Geneva, Illinois, 60134
Phone 630.938.4769
Fax 630.871.9869
General Inquires [email protected]
  • facebook
  • linkedin

Contact Us

©2025 Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC. All rights reserved.

Law Firm Web Design by NMC

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}