Skip to Content
Logo
Menu
  • About Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Our People
  • Learning Library
  • Corporate Transparency Act
  • Contact
  • Make A Payment

Class Action Waivers: The Supreme Court to Have the Last Word

Class Action Waivers: The Supreme Court to Have the Last Word

December 5, 2017

Class action lawsuits against employers are most likely to arise in the wage and hour context.

Different Interpretations of FLSA

The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) is complex and its enforcement can be unpredictable. This unpredictability is particularly evident in the different ways that President Obama’s Department of Labor interpreted the FLSA compared with how President Trump’s DOL is interpreting the FLSA now.

Moreover, the FLSA does not require a showing of ill intent to establish a violation. Even “good” employers can find themselves as named defendants for a technical violation of the FLSA.

Arbitration Agreements and Class Action Waviers

One strategy that CCM uses with its clients is the execution of a class action waiver in conjunction with an agreement to arbitrate employment disputes. For those clients that adopt arbitration agreements, CCM often includes a class action waiver. The United States Supreme Court has generally supported class action waivers in the context of arbitration agreements. DirecTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 136 S. Ct. 463.

Legality of Class Action Waivers

Meanwhile, the National Labor Relations Board is hostile to class action waivers arguing that they violate Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. See Wednesday Evening Word, No. 12 for a more in-depth discussion of Section 7 of the NLRA.

There is a split among the various circuit courts across the country about the legality of class action waivers as they relate to the NLRA. Three circuit courts: the 5th Circuit, the 2nd Circuit, and the 8th Circuit have all held that class action waivers are legal.

On the other hand, the 7th Circuit (Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin), along with the 9th Circuit and the 6th Circuit have struck down class action waivers as a violation of Section 7 of the NLRA because they interfere with workers’ rights to engage in concerted activity, namely, class action litigation for their mutual benefit and protection.

The United States Supreme Court will decide this issue during the coming term when it hears oral arguments with respect to three consolidated cases National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, and Ernst & Young LLP v. Morris. The Court is likely to issue a ruling in January 2018.

If you have any questions about the matters addressed in this CCM Alert, please contact the following CCM author or your regular CCM contact.

Related Attorneys

Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC
Lisle Office
2300 Cabot Drive, Suite 500
Lisle, Illinois, 60532
Phone 630.871.2600
Geneva Office
21 North 4th Street
Geneva, Illinois, 60134
Phone 630.938.4769
Fax 630.871.9869
General Inquires [email protected]
  • facebook
  • linkedin

Contact Us

©2025 Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC. All rights reserved.

Law Firm Web Design by NMC

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}